[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: phantom sources

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: phantom sources
From: Peter Lennox <P.Lennox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:58:59 +0100
Accept-language: en-US, en-GB
Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Approved-by: P.Lennox@xxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: To: William Yost <William.Yost@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon Jul 28 03:47:25 2014
In-reply-to: <11309_1406434435_53D47C83_11309_37_1_11EE7FC5-D8C6-4B77-BE78-8D6326C0F81B@asu.edu>
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
References: <11465_1406348231_53D32BC7_11465_428_1_7C76FA13-6762-4078-B9C7-7071EF74551D@gmail.com>,<11309_1406434435_53D47C83_11309_37_1_11EE7FC5-D8C6-4B77-BE78-8D6326C0F81B@asu.edu>
Reply-to: Peter Lennox <P.Lennox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQHPqIh6NFGKsWhnVk+nRLGm7ogtUZuygDftgAG3mQY=
Thread-topic: phantom sources

and Gunther Thiele's 1985 dissertation, called something like "on the localisation of phantom sources" ( I have it somewhere, but not with me right now)
cheers
ppl
Dr Peter Lennox

School of Technology,
Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology
University of Derby, UK
e: p.lennox@xxxxxxxxxxx
t: 01332 593155
________________________________________
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception [AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Yost [William.Yost@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 July 2014 16:45
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: phantom sources

Fine work in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America by Wes Grantham

Sent from my IPhone
William Yost
William.yost@xxxxxxx<mailto:William.yost@xxxxxxx>
Office: 480-727-7148
Home: 480-306-6755
Cell: 480-231-9250



On Jul 25, 2014, at 9:17 PM, "Philip Robinson" <philrob22@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:philrob22@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Howdy y’all,

I’m doing some investigations preliminary to implementing a room acoustics auralization system and want to get some input from the community.

Is there any good literature on the perceptual difference between a phantom source (e.g. between a stereo pair) and a real source (e.g. center channel)?  I am interested in more than just simple localization: width, resolution of multiple phantoms, etc.? Is perception of a phantom source the same when panned between a triad or a pair of loudspeakers? My basic understanding is that phantom sources are wider or blurrier than real ones, has this been specifically tested?

Any opinions or references are welcome.

Have a great summer,

Philip W. Robinson
Environmental Design Analyst
Specialist Modelling Group

Foster + Partners
Riverside, 22 Hester Road<x-apple-data-detectors://0/0>
London SW11 4AN<x-apple-data-detectors://0/0>
E  probinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:probinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The University of Derby has a published policy regarding email and reserves the right to monitor email traffic. If you believe this was sent to you in error, please select unsubscribe.

Unsubscribe and Security information contact:   infosec@xxxxxxxxxxx
For all FOI requests please contact:   foi@xxxxxxxxxxx
All other Contacts are at http://www.derby.ac.uk/its/contacts/

Prev by Date: Re: phantom sources
Next by Date: 2-year post-doc fellowships at the University of Padova
Previous by thread: Re: phantom sources
Next by thread: Re: phantom sources
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread