[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pitch increase [sic]
Background on this article can be found at:
http://www.acousticscale.org/wiki/index.php/Category:Auditory_Image
Kevin
On 2011, Sep 2, at 7:01 PM, Tom Walters wrote:
> Brittany,
> If you look at voice production from the source-filter perspective, a pitch change corresponds to a change in the sampling of the spectral envelope. The spectral envelope itself is a function of the configuration and length of the vocal tract. As the pitch increases, the spectral envelope becomes more sparsely sampled by the harmonics of the driving pulse train, so in that sense information is lost as pitch increases. A five-semitone increase in the pitch corresponds to changing the density of sampling of the spectral envelope by a factor of about 3/4 (1/(2^(5/12)). The train of harmonics also rises in frequency, of course, so some will be lost 'off the top' of the spectrum, however this is probably a negligible effect - more important is the change in she sampling density of the envelope.
>
> The (cartoon, idealized) figures on this page might help visualize what's going on in the time domain and the frequency domain as the pitch changes:
> http://www.acousticscale.org/wiki/index.php/Acoustic_Scale_in_Communication_Sounds#Size_Information_and_Acoustic_Scale_in_Communication_Sounds
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom
>
> On 2 September 2011 12:27, Brittany Guidone <brittanyguidone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> Can anyone tell me what systemally happens to a males voice when the pitch
>> of it is increased by five semi tones? Is any information lost? Or are the
>> frequencies too high for humans to be able to hear all of the components of
>> that the original voice contains when the voice's pitch is altered? I
>> somewhat understand the pitch, but I am unable to understand what actually
>> happens to a human voice when the pitch is changed by a number of semi
>> tones. If anyone knows about pitch change how humans percieve pitch changes
>> I would be interested in knowing.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Brittany Guidone