As Dan explained last time this was discussed, the correct reference to
the formula cited by Beauchamp is
LL Beranek, Acoustic Measurements, Wiley, New York, 1949), p.329.
as the source for mel(f) = 1127 ln(1 + f/700)
Jim Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception
[mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:04 PM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] frequency to mel formula
We discussed this last year. See
http://www.auditory.org/mhonarc/2008/msg00191.html
http://www.auditory.org/mhonarc/2008/msg00189.html
and the surrounding thread.
I think the actual origin is Fant in a paper in Swedish from 1949,
summarized in his 1973 book:
Fant, C G M "Analys av de svenska konsonantljuden" LM Ericsson
protokoll H/P 1064, 1949: 139pp.
referenced on p. 48 of
Fant, G "Speech Sounds and Features", MIT Press, 1973.
but Fant uses log(1+f/1000). The log(1+f/700) was attributed to
O'Shaughnessy, D. (1978) Speech communication: Human and machine.
Addison-Wesley, New York, page 150.
DAn.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:11 PM, James W.
Beauchamp<jwbeauch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear List,
On the Wikipedia page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_frequency_scale
a formula for computing frequency in terms of mels is given as:
mel = log(1 + fr/700)*1127 .
It is easily inverted to fr = 700*exp(mel/1127 - 1) .
My question is: Where do these formulas come from? I.e., I need
a journal reference for these formulas.
Thanks much,
Jim Beauchamp
Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign