Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:14:13 -0700
From: christopher jette <christopherjette@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: About silence and breath
Greetings All,
I have enjoyed this thread of discussion and while I may not be
adding a
great deal of substance to the discussion, I would like to make an
observation. Kevin begins his response by qualifying his perspective
as that
of a composer, previously another responder elucidated the role of
rests in
demarcating phrases in traditional forms. This made me take a step
back and
say "what is the role of silence in music? depends on what you mean by
music." This has obviously changed as music has changed and I can
easily
imagine a responder qualifying their remarks by asserting that they
write
music which is of X persuasion. This is all my way of saying that
silence,
rests, breaks, segmentation or what have you are part of a
vernacular not a
language. If this conversation were to poll millions of people
across the
world, the perspectives on what is meant by music and by silence....
that
might be interesting and certainly there would be some common camps.
It seems to me that the first step in modeling silence is to define
in what
context. In classical forms, indeed one must consider the phrase and
the
manner in which it commonly (even statistically) functioned. To this
end I
might point out the work of the composer Clarence Barlow in his
program
Autobusk and in the interest of disclosure he is also one of my
teachers.
Cheers~
Christopher
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Kevin Austin <kevin.austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>wrote:
Responding as a composer, not a scientist, in this context I have
used the
word "segmentation" to mean to determine where something 'begins' and
'ends', possibly a very low level (fundamental) process, and this
(in my
use) is perceptual. Segmentation therefor occurs at many levels,
largely
dependent upon the perceptual / cognitive processes of the
individual.
Best
Kevin