[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure
From: Sylvain BUSSON <Sylvain.BUSSON@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:08:38 +0200
Approved-by: Sylvain.BUSSON@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri May 29 10:55:46 2009
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
Reply-to: Sylvain BUSSON <Sylvain.BUSSON@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear all,

The adaptive up-dow procedure offers many benefits over methode of constants.
Does anyone know if one of theses benefits is related to the number of repetition for each condition ?
In other words, can we get a reliable threshold estimate with only 3 repetitions (3 tracks for the same condition) ?

Sylvain BUSSON
Research Ingineer
ENSIETA DTN/SOHO
00 33 2.98.34.88.81
sylvain.busson@xxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: Speech Quality Assessment Recent Developments
Next by Date: Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure
Previous by thread: Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure
Next by thread: Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread