OT: email format

[Kevin Austin <kevin.austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There are some formating issues with how the digest sends out 
postings. This is not my area of expertise but I am told by an IT 
person that it's a combination of the sender and the way the 
digest-maker works.

It can look like this:


>  Cochlea", Physiological Review 81, 1306-1352; the upper part of=20
Fig.=20
>  14 shows data of Russell and Nilsen on guinea-pig BM=20
displacement=20
>  versus cochlear longitudinal position x_a in response to 15-kHz=20
>  sinusoidal tones; x_a, the distance from the apex, ranges from=20
13.5=20
>  to 17 mm; BM length is about 19 mm; so x_b, the distance from=20
the=20
>  base, ranges from about 2 to 5.5 mm. At sound pressure levels=20
(SPL)=20
>  of 15, 20, 25, ... , 60, 70 dB there is an active peak at about=20
x_a =3D=20
>  14.47 mm. At SPL =3D 55, 60, ... , 90, 100 dB there is a passive=20
peak=20
>  at about x_a =3D 15.86 mm. At SPL < 55 dB no data are shown in=20
the=20
>  passive-peak x_a-region.=20
> =20


For visually impaired readers, or others who have text to voice 
readers, this is problematic.



Best wishes

Kevin