[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AUDITORY Digest - 12 Aug 2007 to 13 Aug 2007 (#2007-181)
Christian,
We did a little study in '73 that was somewhat relevant to your
question, although our approach was not to combine forced-choice and
ratings. Instead we allowed the listener in a 2AFC task to respond
"uncertain" when she couldn't be sure. Then we manipulated their
criteria for using the uncertain response, through instructions, causing
them to use it from 0-75% of the time. Treating the data as though from
a 3 pt rating scale, d' was essentially independent of their use of the
uncertain response.
Watson, C.S., Kellogg, S.C., Kawanishi, D.T. and Lucas, P.A. (1973).
The uncertain response in detection-oriented psychophysics. J. Exp.
Psychol., 99, 180 185.
Hope that is of some help,
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception
[mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of AUDITORY automatic digest
system
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:04 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: AUDITORY Digest - 12 Aug 2007 to 13 Aug 2007 (#2007-181)
There are 6 messages totalling 335 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. forced-choice
2. voice morphing
3. PRATT by PAUL Boersma (2)
4. Effect of duration on noise discrimination (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:28:38 +0200
From: Christian Kaernbach <auditorymail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: forced-choice
Dear List,
I am looking for references demonstrating that participants in a
forced-choice experiment, given the possibility to rate the confidence
of their forced choice, show better-than-random answers even at their
lowest confidence rating (which might be labeled "I guessed completely
because I did not know"). If I remember correctly this has been quite
enthusiastically studied in the 70ies, in terms of implicit and explicit
knowledge.
Thanks in advance,
Chris
--=20
Prof. Dr. Christian Kaernbach
Allgemeine Psychologie
Institut f=FCr Psychologie
Christian-Albrechts-Universit=E4t zu Kiel
Olshausenstr. 62
D-24098 Kiel
Germany
www.kaernbach.de
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:32:40 +0100
From: John Culling <cullingj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: voice morphing
Roy means "Praat."
>>> Roy Patterson <rdp1@xxxxxxxxx> 12 August 2007 17:38:41 >>>
Hello Yinqiu Gao,
There are two software packages available to assist with morphing,
STRAIGHT by Hideki Kawahara and PRATT by Peter Boersma.
In the hands of Kawahara-san, STRAIGHT produces astoundingly good
morphing.
Regards Roy P
Tony Robinson wrote:
> Run a pitch tracker, segment the residual into pitch periods then
> overlap-and-add to your new desired pitch contour.
--
Roy and Karalyn Patterson
17 Woodlands Road
Great Shelford, Cambridge, CB22 5LW
Phone +44 1223 842310 (International format)
email
rdp1@xxxxxxxxx
karalyn.patterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:46:50 +0100
From: Roy Patterson <rdp1@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PRATT by PAUL Boersma
Please note that PRATT was developed by Paul Boursma (not Peter).
Apologies.
Roy P
--
Roy and Karalyn Patterson
17 Woodlands Road
Great Shelford, Cambridge, CB22 5LW
Phone +44 1223 842310 (International format)
email
rdp1@xxxxxxxxx
karalyn.patterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:28:37 +0200
From: Henkjan Honing <honing@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PRATT by PAUL Boersma
On 13 Aug 2007, at 10:46, Roy Patterson wrote:
> Please note that PRATT was developed by Paul Boursma (not Peter).
To be even more precise :-)
its PRAAT by Paul Boersma & David Weenink, University of Amsterdam
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
hh
__________________________________________________
Dr H. Honing
Music Cognition Group
ILLC / Universiteit van Amsterdam
I http://www.hum.uva.nl/mmm/hh/
Music Matters: http://www.musiccognition.nl/blog
__________________________________________________
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:55:57 +0200
From: tom TM <t.l.j.goossens@xxxxxx>
Subject: Effect of duration on noise discrimination
Dear list,
Can anyone point me to additional references regarding duration
dependencies in noise discrimination? So far I've found the following
papers containing such duration dependencies:
Hanna, Thomas E.
"Discrimination of reproducible noise as a function of bandwidth and
duration"
Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 36 (5), p. 409-416
Heller, Laurie M and Trahiotis, Constantine
"The discrimination of samples of noise in monotic, diotic, and dichotic
conditions"
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995, 97 (6), p. 3775-3781
Fallon, Suzan M.
"Discriminability of bursts of reproducible noise"
Dissertation - Indiana University, 1998
All publications with noiselike stimuli, and especially Gaussian noise,
that measured discrimination ability as a function of time are very much
appreciated.
Thanks in advance and kind regards,
Tom Goossens
--
_________________________________________________
ir. T.L.J. Goossens
Ph.D. student Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Philips Research
Auditory and Multisensory Perception, room p0.88
High Tech Campus 36
5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
phone: +31 (0)40 2743160
email: t.l.j.goossens@xxxxxx
_________________________________________________
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:49:01 -0400
From: Bruno Repp <repp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Effect of duration on noise discrimination
--============_-1025105953==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=46or a review of research on effects of cycle=20
duration on the ability to detect repetition of a=20
noise waveform, see
Kaernbach, C. (2004). Auditory sensory memory and=20
short-term memory. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schr=F6ger,=20
& H. M=FCller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond=20
sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition=20
(pp. 331-348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Best,
Bruno
>Dear list,
>
>Can anyone point me to additional references=20
>regarding duration dependencies in noise=20
>discrimination? So far I've found the following=20
>papers containing such duration dependencies:
>
>Hanna, Thomas E.
>"Discrimination of reproducible noise as a function of bandwidth and
durati=
on"
>Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 36 (5), p. 409-416
>
>
>Heller, Laurie M and Trahiotis, Constantine
>"The discrimination of samples of noise in=20
>monotic, diotic, and dichotic conditions"
>Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995, 97 (6), p.
3775-3781
>
>Fallon, Suzan M.
>"Discriminability of bursts of reproducible noise"
>Dissertation - Indiana University, 1998
>
>All publications with noiselike stimuli, and=20
>especially Gaussian noise, that measured=20
>discrimination ability as a function of time are=20
>very much appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance and kind regards,
>
>Tom Goossens
>
>--
>_________________________________________________
>
>ir. T.L.J. Goossens
>Ph.D. student Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
>
>Philips Research
>Auditory and Multisensory Perception, room p0.88
>High Tech Campus 36
>5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
>phone: +31 (0)40 2743160
>email: t.l.j.goossens@xxxxxx
>_________________________________________________
--
Bruno H. Repp
Haskins Laboratories
300 George Street
New Haven, CT 06511-6624
Tel. (203) 865-6163, ext. 236
=46ax (203) 865-8963
http://www.haskins.yale.edu/staff/repp.html
--============_-1025105953==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: Effect of duration on noise
discrimination</title></head><body>
<div>For a review of research on effects of cycle duration on the
ability to detect repetition of a noise waveform, see</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Kaernbach, C. (2004). Auditory sensory memory and short-term
memory. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schr=F6ger, & H. M=FCller (Eds.),<i>
Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human
cognition</i> (pp. 331-348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div>Bruno</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite>Dear list,<br>
<br>
Can anyone point me to additional references regarding duration
dependencies in noise discrimination? So far I've found the following
papers containing such duration dependencies:<br>
<br>
Hanna, Thomas E.<br>
"Discrimination of reproducible noise as a function of bandwidth
and duration"<br>
Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 36 (5), p. 409-416<br>
<br>
<br>
Heller, Laurie M and Trahiotis, Constantine<br>
"The discrimination of samples of noise in monotic, diotic, and
dichotic conditions"<br>
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995, 97 (6), p.
3775-3781<br>
<br>
=46allon, Suzan M.<br>
"Discriminability of bursts of reproducible noise"<br>
Dissertation - Indiana University, 1998<br>
<br>
All publications with noiselike stimuli, and especially Gaussian
noise, that measured discrimination ability as a function of time are
very much appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance and kind regards,<br>
<br>
Tom Goossens<br>
<br>
--<br>
_________________________________________________<br>
<br>
ir. T.L.J. Goossens<br>
Ph.D. student Technische Universiteit Eindhoven<br>
<br>
Philips Research<br>
Auditory and Multisensory Perception, room p0.88<br>
High Tech Campus 36<br>
5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands<br>
phone: +31 (0)40 2743160<br>
email: t.l.j.goossens@xxxxxx<br>
_________________________________________________</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div>Bruno H. Repp<br>
Haskins Laboratories<br>
300 George Street<br>
New Haven, CT 06511-6624<br>
Tel. (203) 865-6163, ext. 236<br>
=46ax (203) 865-8963<br>
http://www.haskins.yale.edu/staff/repp.html</div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1025105953==_ma============--
------------------------------
End of AUDITORY Digest - 12 Aug 2007 to 13 Aug 2007 (#2007-181)
***************************************************************