Dear Diana (and List),
Yes indeed! The repetitions do seem to comvert spoken speech to singing.
I wonder whether your phenomenon isn't related to that of "semantic
satiation", in which a word that is repeated over and over tends to
lose its meaning and to be perceived as a sequence of sounds. The
meaning is not lost in an all-or-nothing fashion, but tends to get
weaker and weaker. (See
.http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499s99/yamauchi/semantic.htm)
In the case of your demonstration there is a strongly modulated F0
(intonation contour) over the phrase. It may be that when we hear
ordinary speech, which contains pitch modulation (an acoustic
phenomenon that is present in both music and speech), the speech and
musical schemas are both evoked and compete with one another.
However, when the cues for speech are dominant (i.e., continuous and
non-repeating modulation of F0, without pausing on particular
pitches), the musical interpretation is suppressed. But when the
phrase is repeated many times, a satiation and weakening of the speech
interpretation occurs (as in semantic satiation), thereby allowing the
musical interpretation to become more dominant. Of course it doesn't
become completely dominant, or else we wouldn't hear speech at all.
Rather there is an intermediate form of activation in which we hear
both speech and music (i.e., singing).
In your demonstration, immediately after hearing the phase as melodic,
when we listen to the whole sentence again, we still maintain an
association between the phrase and the melodic interpretation. I
wonder how long this aftereffect lasts.
Your demonstration raises the fascinating question of why we don't
ALWAYS hear speech as singing. It may be that persons with absolute
pitch come closer to this than the rest of us do, or at least can turn
it on when they want to. A number of years ago, I asked Poppy Crum, a
graduate student of mine who had absolute pitch, whether she could
assign musical note values to my intonation pattern as I said a
phrase. She replied that this was easy, and gave me a sequence of
note names.
Whatever the explanation of your phenomenon, it is truly interesting,
and raises some challenging questions. I hope you yourself, or some
of our colleagues, will be able to shed light on the phenomenon
through a series of analytical experiments.
All the best,
Al
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Albert S. Bregman, Emeritus Professor
Psychology Department, McGill University
1205 Docteur Penfield Avenue
Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1B1.
Tel: (514) 484-2592, (514) 398-6103
Fax: (514) 484-2592
www.psych.mcgill.ca/labs/auditory/Home.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On 12/12/06, Diana Deutsch <ddeutsch@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear list,
I've had a number of requests for the sound demonstration I
presented at
the recent ASA meeting in Honolulu, in which the spoken phrase 'sometimes
behave so strangely' following several repetitions, appears convincingly
to be sung rather than spoken - though there is no musical context and no
physical transformation of the sound. This demonstration, together with
spoken commentary, is on my CD 'Phantom Words and Other Curiosities'
(available from Philomel Records - http://www.philomel.com).
The sound demonstration is also posted on the website:
http://philomel.com/phantom_words/description.html#sometimes
and it's described in the booklet accompanying the CD, which is posted at:
http://philomel.com/phantom_words/booklet/
Happy Holidays!
Diana Deutsch
------------------------------------------------------
--