[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: two cycles

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: two cycles
From: Mike Ravicz <Mike_Ravicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:03:02 -0500
Delivery-date: Mon Nov 6 10:20:41 2006
In-reply-to: <f06230920c17208905739@[129.60.221.219]>
List-help: <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
References: <454BB628.8040200@alum.mit.edu> <f06230920c17208905739@[129.60.221.219]>
Reply-to: Mike Ravicz <Mike_Ravicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Apologies for a possibly naïve question (I haven't read any of the papers mentioned), but is it possible that mechanical resonance and ringing in the cochlea extends the effective duration of a two-cycle stimulus? - Mike Ravicz

References:
- two cycles
  - From: Fred Herzfeld
- Re: two cycles
  - From: Alain de Cheveigne'

Prev by Date: Re: two cycles
Next by Date: Computer Speech and Language Special Issue -- Call for papers
Previous by thread: Re: two cycles
Next by thread: Re: two cycles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread