[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: normal hearing 2
- To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: normal hearing 2
- From: "Freed, Dan" <DFreed@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:50:10 -0800
- Comments: To: "Bruno L. Giordano" <bruno.giordano@MUSIC.MCGILL.CA>
- Delivery-date: Fri Feb 24 14:04:15 2006
- Reply-to: "Freed, Dan" <DFreed@xxxxxxx>
- Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcY5RjjjE1KOqy0yTTm4PzOpNSZJVwALDOtA
- Thread-topic: normal hearing 2
There seems to be some controversy on this point. See:
Martin FN & Champlin CA (2000), "Reconsidering the limits of normal hearing", J Am Acad Audiol 11:64-66.
Dan Freed
Senior Engineer, Hearing Aid Research Lab
House Ear Institute
2100 W. Third St.
Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
Phone: +1-213-353-7084
Fax: +1-213-413-0950
Email: dfreed@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruno L. Giordano
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 5:20 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: normal hearing 2
Dear list,
In a recent posting ("normal hearing", April 2005) I found mention of the
criteria and of the ISO standards which define normal results for
audiometric tests.
In the summary posting it is mentioned that non-normal, by definition, is
anything higher than 0 dB HL, and, again, that non-normal, probably in the
field of clinical audiology, is anything below 25 dB HL (adults).
Now, my question might seem quite recursive, but:
is there a standard for deciding that the hearing of an individual is not
standard?
Thank you,
Bruno
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bruno L. Giordano, PhD
CIRMMT
Schulich School of Music, McGill University
555 Sherbrooke Street West
Montréal, QC H3A 1E3
Canada