[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
From: John Culling <cullingj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:48:59 +0000
Delivery-date: Thu Feb 2 23:02:15 2006
In-reply-to: <43E0EF58.907@nidcd.nih.gov>
References: <43E0EF58.907@nidcd.nih.gov>
Reply-to: John Culling <cullingj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

We have looked into the ER-30s. There are two things about the ER-30 
that make them seem a bit unattractive. One is that they seem to have
a poor frequency response with a steep low-pass characteristic. The
other is that they appear to simply be ER-3s with very long tubes
attached and an MRI-compatible price tag. If this is the case, then one
is being expected to pay several hundred dollars for the tubes.

John.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
  - From: Marina Papoutsi

References:
- Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
  - From: Marina Papoutsi

Prev by Date: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
Next by Date: Final reminder for submissions to ICAD 2006
Previous by thread: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
Next by thread: Re: Questions on Etymotic ER-30 insert earphones
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread