Minor third

[Al Bregman <bregman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear List,

Jeremy Day-O'Connell wrote (via Pierre Divenyi):
"My own hypothesis is that the minor third represents a compromise between
two opposite tendencies, one vocal, one perceptual: 1) the _smaller_ the
interval, the easier to produce a consistent vocal tone on the two notes;
2) the _larger_ the interval, the easier the task of melodic "scene
analysis" in noisy real-world situations."

Regarding the second point, I would imagine that the opposite would be
true:  the larger the interval, the more difficult it would be to track the
sequence in a noisy real-world situation.  Small intervals favor coherence;
in an A-B sequence, the larger the interval between A and B (i.e., the
smaller the similarity between them), the greater  the likelihood that one
of the sounds (A or B) will find a more similar sound to group with than
the other sound of the A-B sequence.

This means that BOTH the vocal ease and the perceptual coherence would
favor small intervals.

Al


---------------------------------------------
Albert S. Bregman,
Emeritus Professor
Psychology Dept., McGill University
1205 Docteur Penfield Avenue
Montreal, Quebec
Canada  H3A 1B1

Office:
     Voice: +1 (514) 398-6103
     Fax:     +1 (514) 398-4896

---------------------------------------------