[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Young and long-standing?

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Young and long-standing?
From: "Richard J. Fabbri" <fabbri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:39:50 -0500
Comments: To: Stuart Rosen <stuart@PHONETICS.UCL.AC.UK>
In-reply-to: <000701bf5d0a$ff42d790$80342880@pc29.phon.ucl.ac.uk>
Reply-to: "Richard J. Fabbri" <fabbri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Stuart,

Christian Spevak's phrase was conjunctive:

        ... "[AND] internationally acclaimed experts,
        holding a long-standing reputation" ...

His lead phrase was:

        ... "Many young academics of the new generation,
        full of innovative ideas" ...

Actually, I'll place my order simply to see what we old farts
may be missing with our "long stranding reputations".

___________________Reply Separator_____________________
At 02:40 PM 01/12/2000 -0000, Stuart Rosen wrote:
>How long-standing a reputation can you have when you are still
>a 'young' academic?

References:
- Young and long-standing?
  - From: Stuart Rosen

Prev by Date: Young and long-standing?
Next by Date: Research Opportunities: Speech Recognition Technology / Speech Therapy
Previous by thread: Young and long-standing?
Next by thread: Re: Young and long-standing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread