[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (why is high high)

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: (why is high high)
From: "Edward M. Burns" <pwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:15:55 -0700
Comments: To: pq@nencki.gov.pl
In-reply-to: <199808311348.PAA06431@ameba.nencki.gov.pl>
Reply-to: "Edward M. Burns" <pwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

see Burns and Sampat (1980) " A note on possible culture-bound differences in
frequency discrimination," JASA 68, 1886-88, and refs therein.

Like Wightman (and others) have said, doesn't anybody do a literature search
before posting questions that will generate 10 inane responses for every
relevant one?

Email to AUDITORY should now be sent to AUDITORY@lists.mcgill.ca
LISTSERV commands should be sent to listserv@lists.mcgill.ca
Information is available on the WEB at http://www.mcgill.ca/cc/listserv

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (why is high high)
  - From: Al Bregman

References:
- Re: (why is high high)
  - From: Pawel Kusmierek

Prev by Date: Re: pitch
Next by Date: Re: (why is high high)
Previous by thread: Re: (why is high high)
Next by thread: Re: (why is high high)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread